Видео

Keep it up!

Listening to this after many years. Not bad - this guy speaks well. Err, me :)

Two testing rockstars. I just love this webinar

03:10 Louise Perold, Building "Quality" Connections in a Remote World 17:30 questions & answers 25:40 James Thomas, Random Exploration of a Chatbot API 48:20 questions & answers

00:05 Rajni Hatti 47:27 Tariq King

Absolutely, brilliant and entertaining. Henrik held a straight face until 17:58 which was much longer than I could have. Well done!

I think AI in games makes sense but I am more skeptical AI applies as well to some other spaces.

Great video with concrete examples of your test session. It's incredibly useful to record yourself and than play it back. I like how you disect every step of your testing.

Might want to re-upload this with cleaned up and NORMALIZEDa audio levels.

So she didn't actually test Buddhism.

Can we watch this talk?

Nice!!

56:32 People in 2020 be like "Google Glass" Reference, oh how cute!

Great! Why I wasn't aware of this lecture. Very much informative and inspiring. Simply great!

The universe in a single atom

First. Yo!

I am a late arriver here. :) The presenter makes what seem to me solid remarks and recommendations re: responding intelligently/effectively to assumptions and statements. Yet I ask: why hang all this on the disputed framework of neuro-linguistic programming? (Check citations in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming#Notes_and_references )

I wish we could see her slides :/

It's a shame the screen is no in view

Good talk as always guys 👍

Yes, yes, yes!!!!

Another guru who is trying to sell techne and episteme.

Interesting perspectives on Resume's, interviews, jd etc..I'm based out of Australia and of late finding the jd's for testers getting ridiculous with most of them expecting candidates to have knowledge/experience of multiple tools, scripting languages and technologies. Don't think a typical Tester might able to address a lot of those criteria's..

I would love more in depth testing examples

Good talk that has aged well, still relevant in 2018.

great presentation

Great product and great QA thanks King

It has been astonishingly remarkable progress in automation!

impressed.

Thats my daughter

The aam aaam was so annoying I turned the program off. I do not mean to slight you but you should have done some editing.

At 45:40, the thing about low risk situations sounds plausible but in my experience it is clearly NOT true when dealing with monolithic legacy code (>10 years in production) due to the accumulation of an incredible amount of dependencies in the code that make innocuous changes cause bugs in seemingly unrelated places.

not bad but...too emotional - so autism is "a mental condition, present from early childhood, characterized by great difficulty in communicating and forming relationships with other people and in using language and abstract concepts." Developers/software engineers gotta have skills in using language and abstract concepts, otherwise how would a team work (assuming no silos)!?

Interesting idea

Insanely good talk.

What should I do to have access to the online streaming of the conference? There is no URL/further details within the announcement.

Just Awesome !!!

The initial article which james mentioned in the beginning "Test Cases are Not Testing: Toward a Performance Culture" @ www.testingtrapezemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/TestingTrapeze-2014-February.pdf

great talk

Its nice to see someone on the same page good work Richard! Automated checking (a set of pre validated inputs exhibit pre validated outputs) Exploratory Testing (Is about using scientific methods to validate / verify evolving hypotheses in order to learn about the system)

Superb. Spot on!

great video, with lots of useful resources mentioned, I took quite a few notes, thanks for sharing your journey.

It seems to me it's mostly the term "test automation" Mr. Bach has an issue with. Test automation is to testing as a calculator is to math: both are tools to let computers do what they do better than humans, and neither is stupid/toxic/useless when used in the proper way (and he did use an automation tool in his example!). I understand Mr. Bach frustration when having to deal with people who believe an automated test is an alternative to a human, but he seems to be trolling a bit in his way to express his objection.. I wonder how he would feel if the method was called something along the lines of "test programming". Word Origin and History for calculator n. late 14c., "mathematician, one who calculates," from Latin calculator

This whole test automation thing is just stupid. I don't know for a fact but I think Bach is intentionally trying to stir up controversy by saying "test automation is stupid", but isn't explaining that he only means the word not actually automating stuff like regression testing

Man, what is going on with the volume levels....

The speaker at 52:00 was correct that development automation and QA automation are not comparable in the way James was trying to. I get it; he wants to avoid the perception that you can just automate the entirely of the job. He's trying to make a good point (that QA testers can't simply be replaced w/"magical" automation) but using a poor comparison.

09:15 Heuristics of testability (James Bach, www.satisfice.com/tools/testable.pdf) 14:40 The 3 questions 27:36 Dimensions of testability (Ben Kelly & Maria Kedemo) slides at schd.ws/hosted_files/cast2015/f3/Visualizing%20Testability%202015%20CAST.pdf

Love the slide around 40:00 -- would any other profession promote "automated" itself.

Bravo. Excellent observations which we can all learn from.

Heuristics: A rule of thumb, a fallible way of solving a problem. Divide by Zero: What do you do to a number to get the result as undefined